First of all I’m sorry for my rude comments which was uncalled for. It did not help my situation.
*Second, I'm not gonna pursue this any further. I mean it. But I'm happy to provide inputs if anything is required from my side.*
In case /profile/824-cassie/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="824" href="/profile/824-cassie/" rel="">@cassie /profile/1287-the-unusual-suspect/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="1287" href="/profile/1287-the-unusual-suspect/" rel="">@The UnUsual Suspect /profile/27886-wxhere/?do=hovercard" data-mentionid="27886" href="/profile/27886-wxhere/" rel="">@wxhere wanna take a second look
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:FCBPCM5PPCY6TNH3UELAWP36O7D3IRXO&dn=%5BHi10%5D_Hataraku_Maou-sama%21_%5BBD_1080p%5D_%5BDual_Audio%5D&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fanisaishuu.de%3A2710%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.publicbt.com%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.istole.it%3A80%2Fannounce&xl=2357080564
Couple of facts -
1. The torrent has no seeds and entirely downloaded from webseeds. I understand the behaviour of web seeds as TUS said, it directly downloads as file instead of piece. So if a piece was already acquired from BitTorrent peers, and if the piece is part of the file downloaded from web seeds, there will surely be duplicate data downloaded which is wasted. But in this case, the torrent is exclusively downloaded from webseeds due to no seeds/peers.
2. I tested the behaviour in BC and qBt. In qBt no wastage of data is observed. It is not because qBt did not report it, but the actual downloaded data is equal to the task size.
Please look into the first comment of the below post which might provide some insight
[https://www.cometforums.com/topic/12801395-web-seeds-wasting-data/](/topic/12801395-web-seeds-wasting-data/)
and
[https://www.cometforums.com/topic/12801395-web-seeds-wasting-data/?do=findComment&comment=82489](/topic/12801395-web-seeds-wasting-data/?do=findComment&comment=82489)
Again, I'm not expecting any replies, neither gonna pursue it any further. Just thought of letting the team know that there may be some issue. Read time for entire thread mentioned above should be about 5 mins. Please read it if possible.
Thanks