alecleekya Posted August 5, 2009 Share Posted August 5, 2009 Is it possible to runing BitComet in the Windows 2003 instances offered by Amazon EC2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The UnUsual Suspect Posted August 5, 2009 Share Posted August 5, 2009 You would have to ask them that, but from what I see in the website, it should support most/all windows programs. I am however at a loss why someone would want too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kluelos Posted August 5, 2009 Share Posted August 5, 2009 I don't think you could profitably do this. You would essentially have multiple instances of Bitcomet that are completely uncoordinated with each other, but close coordination is vital for cloud computing. It's essentially, "you work on that part of it while I work on this part of it." In Bittorrent terms, this would be, "you download that piece while I download this piece, and we'll put them all together here." If they're not coordinated, you could have six instances downloading the same piece six times instead of six different pieces - wasting resources and money, while not getting the job done. BitComet has no provision for scheduling the efforts of multiple instances of itself to divide up the work or to assemble the fruits of those instances. It would take a pretty major rewrite to add that. Not many people would be willing to pay the cost to run it, and Amazon probably has a rule against using EC3 for anything illegal. Beyond that, feasibility would depend on whether each member of the cloud has independent internet access, which you would have to ask Amazon about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alecleekya Posted August 6, 2009 Author Share Posted August 6, 2009 The reason I want to put bitcomet on the cloud is that currently I am subscribing an extra internet connection solely for the purpose of doing BitTorrent and Shareaza things. I got free connection from library and office which of course doesn't allow BitTorrent stuff. So I am forced to pay for a connection purely for something I would use occasionally. From what I understand, Amazon EC2 offers quite an impressive network speed and I guess this would mean my download/upload would be fast. I am not trying to run multiple instances but just delegating the tasks to someone who I thinkg can do the job better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The UnUsual Suspect Posted August 8, 2009 Share Posted August 8, 2009 sounds like what you really want is a seedbox. A dedicated (or shared) server that runs a bittorrent client at speeds upto 1024mbit per second (thats over 130,000kB/s in bittorrent speed), but most run at 100mbit or slower (still 12,800kB/s). When you rent a dedicated server, you actually get these speeds, but a shared server will have several users sharing (often unequally) the same bandwidth. For the most part, these servers run from $50 to 100 usd a month, but I've seen some shared plans that are a lot cheaper, but never seen even one happy customer using one of the cheap ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now