TiKiSMiKiS Posted November 24, 2006 Share Posted November 24, 2006 Since many versions, actually 0.70 i have this little problem and decide to post. IpFilter.dat xxx.xxx.xx1.000 - xxx.xxx.xx1.255 , 255 , # Servers 10 Mbits xxx.xxx.xx2.000 - xxx.xxx.xx2.255 , 255 , # Servers 100 Mbits 000.000.000.000 - 255.255.255.255 , 000 , # No intruders when launching This ipfilter block ALL the ip's, including the 'allowed' ip's. If that ip is 'allowed', then stop checking ipfilter.dat };o) Great Work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kluelos Posted November 24, 2006 Share Posted November 24, 2006 You'll probably be a lot happier using PeerGuardian 2. It works for all applications, not just those that recognize a filter file; updates itself rather than requiring you to remember to do it; doesn't need a long time to process and integrate various blocklists; and doesn't require you to export files all over the disk so the various applications can find them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TiKiSMiKiS Posted November 25, 2006 Author Share Posted November 25, 2006 If do not let to all program access to any ip, then i can't post here. If i introduce the ipfilter to the peerguardian then no other program work. Because i only accept traffic from a few peers. The Servers. Thanks, but this is that the ipfilter 'allowed' not work in bitcomet, the 'prohibited' yes. The first two lines are skipped by bitcomet on load. Only load 1 line, the prohibited, and those are 'all' the world. And that is not the way the ipfilter work. 255 are allowed ip's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kluelos Posted November 25, 2006 Share Posted November 25, 2006 It's very difficult to understand your post, but there are a couple of points that I think I do comprehend. PeerGuardian should be used instead of, not as a supplement to, ipfilter.dat It's been my understanding that a subsequent rule overrides an previous rule if there is a conflict, in ipfilters generally, so if your first and second rules say "allow this, allow that" and your third rule says "allow nothing" then the third rule wins and nothing is allowed. Make your restrictions first, followed by your permissions rules and it should work the way you want. I've never encountered any filter that works as you describe, "process the first line or first two lines then stop". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TiKiSMiKiS Posted November 28, 2006 Author Share Posted November 28, 2006 IP rules file: ipfilter.dat loaded, 1 entries. Independient of the work process, the rules are not loaded. If they are not loaded, they can not be processed. Well or bad. Writing the ipfilter.dat as you indicate don't work. Only load the Deny lines '000'. I know is a dificult aspect. Good Work. Thanks. Edited : Searched the firewall in OpenBSD based in ipfilter -> http://geodsoft.com/howto/harden/OpenBSD/ipfrules.txt Note the allowed and the deny order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now