ami289 Posted December 6, 2006 Share Posted December 6, 2006 it happend to me since is witched from 0.7 to 0.77 and to 0.79.........when i'm looking at the users i'm downloading from i see for example two users which i download 1 kb/s from each one of them....but in the total download speed of the torrent it ustable and giving me like 10-20 times more faster then i'm really downloading.....also the 'time left' counter is unstable and giving fake information......anyone else getting this problems???..........in my opinion 0.63 and 0.7 were the best versions....didn't had any problems with those two......although i didn't used the 0.7 long time...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jago Posted December 6, 2006 Share Posted December 6, 2006 Yes. I noticed this fake. I think there are a lack of precision in BitComet calculations. for ex: 1 kB/s instead of 1.9 kB/s... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitdave Posted December 6, 2006 Share Posted December 6, 2006 Precise calculation of bandwidth is an unnecessary waste of resources. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kluelos Posted December 6, 2006 Share Posted December 6, 2006 Especially since a LOT of that communication is not downloading, but negotiation: "here's what I've got, here's what I need, got anything to trade?" You can pretty much assume that any downloading or uploading at 1 KB/s or less is actually this negotiation rather than transfers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jago Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 <Precise calculation of bandwidth is an unnecessary waste of resources> Ok, so how do you can explain that Azureus consumes less than 50 MB of memory while possesses all possible and imaginable precisions, not only in calculations (progression bars, graphs...) ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nero666 Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 I've noticed this issue too, and since I'm new to these forums, I accidentally posted about it in the Suggestions subforum. The weird calculation tends to happen when the bitrate of one or more peers you're downloading from is lower than 1 KB, and shown as bytes. I presume that the bytes-rate is mistaken for a kilobytes-rates by bitcomet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitdave Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 Ok, so how do you can explain that Azureus consumes less than 50 MB of memory while possesses all possible and imaginable precisions, not only in calculations (progression bars, graphs...) ? What's the point of making precise estimations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Shroud Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 And when has Azureus ever used less than 50 mb of memory? Anyway BitComet (Bamboo) and Azureus (Kademlia) use different DHT structures. They can't be compared because both have to make different calculations for overhead and comunication. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The UnUsual Suspect Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 <Precise calculation of bandwidth is an unnecessary waste of resources> Ok, so how do you can explain that Azureus consumes less than 50 MB of memory while possesses all possible and imaginable precisions, not only in calculations (progression bars, graphs...) ? Azureus often used much more then 100mb of ram on all of my systems. Even with the many memory reducing mods, azureus still uses far more memory then Bit Comet. In fact, if it wasn't for the memory use, I would still be using Azureus. Suspect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now